Slaughter & May Practice Aptitude Test Pack For 2023

Slaughter & May Practice Aptitude Test Pack For 2023

Enhance your practice for Slaughter and may graduate assessment with the updated Slaughter & May Practice Aptitude Test Pack For 2023, featuring all the sections on the actual exams. This book provides insight into what to expect, and helps you develop effective study strategies. Kick off your preparation with our Slaughter & May Practice Aptitude Test Pack For 2023(all-in-one pack):

• Slaughter and May Numerical reasoning test / Cut-e Assessment
• Slaughter and May Verbal reasoning test / Cut-e Assessment
• Slaughter and May Abstract reasoning tests / Cut-e Assessment
• Slaughter and May Logical reasoning tests / Cut-e Assessment

With step-by-step explanations on every question, and hints on how to solve them faster.

About Slaughter and May company

Slaughter and May Aptitude tests formats; What to expect:

Slaughter and May mostly uses Cut-e Assessment style tests for its candidate selection. The sections on the assessments may include any of the following test sections, depending on the role that you applied to and also the country you are applying from:

1. Numerical Reasoning
2. Verbal Reasoning
3. Diagramatic
4. Interview
5. Personality Test

Sample Slaughter and May Graduate Practice Aptitude Test Questions and answers

Slaughter & May Graduate Practice pack Numerical Reasoning

Question 1  If the revenue for Car Rental in 2004 was half that for Hotels in 2005 when Holiday Lettings accounted for 5.04m Euros, what was the revenue from Hotels in 2004? A. 0.84m B. 1.05m C. 1.26m D. 2.10m E. 2.52m EXPLANATION Let the revenue for car rental in 2004 be x Let the hotel in 2005 be y Holidays lettings = 5.04m Therefore in 2015 = 40/100 x y = 5.04m Y = 5.04/ 0.4 = 12.6m, where y in the total revenue in 2005 Therefore, the revenue for hotel y in 2005is given by 20/100 x 12.6 = 2.52m Euros Since x for car rental in 2004 equal half hotels that is x = ½ x 2.52 = 1.26m Euros The revenue of car rental in 2004 is 1.26m Euros. Answer: (C) Question 2 If Other Revenue grew by 50% to 1.26m in 2005, approximately how much revenue did Holiday Lettings generate in 2004? A. 1.05m B. 1.26m C. 2.52m D. 2.63m E. 3.68m EXPLANATION Other revenue increase by 50% to 1.26m in 2005 Initial amount for other revenue is 10% For 50% increase = 0.5 x 0.1 x x 0.1 x x = 1.26, where x is the total revenue in 2005 0.15x = 1.26, x = 8.4m Euros Therefore 0.1 x 8.4 = 0.08 x y, where y is the total revenue in 2004 0.84 = 0.08y, y = 10.5m Euros Since holiday and lettings in 2004 = 0.35 x 10.5 = 3.675 ~ 3.68m. Answer: (E) Question 3 If starting from 2004, Hotel revenue grew by 20% year on year to 2.26m at at2007, approximately how much revenue did hotel revenue account for as at 2004? A. 1.16m B. 1.26m C. 1.52m D. 1.63m E. 1.68m EXPLANATION 16 Seconds year 2004 and hotel revenue = 20% of x, where x is the revenue at 2004: 0.2 x x = 0.2x Year 5 is 20% increase = 20% of 0.2x 0.2x 0.2 x 0.2x 0.2x = 0.24x Year 2006 = 0.2 x 0.24x 0.24x = 0.288x Year 2007 = 0.2 x 0.288x 0.288x = 2.26m 30.3456x = 2.26m,, x = 6.539m Therefore the revenue for 2004 = 0.2 x 6.53m =1. 31m (1.26 is safe) Answer: (C) Question 4 If Travel Revenue grew by 30% to 1m in 2005, approximately how much revenue did Holiday Lettings generate in 2004? A. 1.05m B. 1.26m C. 1.54m D. 2.63m E. 3.68m EXPLANATION 3rd in 2004, travel revenue = 0.35x, where x is the total revenue In 2005 is 30% increase = 0.30 x 0.25x 0.25x = 1m, 0.325x = 1 Total revenue for x = 3.077m in 2004 Therefore holiday lettings revenue = 0.35 x 3.077 = 1.05. Answer: (A)

Slaughter & May Graduate Practice pack Verbal Reasoning

In the past 12 months benefit fraud has fallen by £½ billion to its lowest level for over a decade. The fall is equivalent to a 25 per cent drop to 1.5 percent of the total £100 billion benefit bill. This spectacular fall follows permission for the benefit office to access Inland Revenue taxation data. Benefit officers can now immediately check to see if a claimant is working and claiming benefits intended only for those out of work. This new measure has le d to over 80,000 people being caught making false claims. A similar initiative has also succeeded in a substantial cut in the level of fraud committed by claimants of housing benefit. Local authorities are responsible for the administration of this allowance which is awarded to the unemployed and low paid to help with housing costs. Until recently local authority staff had been unable to access central government records to check the information provided by claimants. These checks have so far identified 44,000 claimants who have provided false information in order to make claims for allowances for which they are not eligible. Question 1. By making it possible to share information, over 120,000 cases of fraud have been detected. A. True B. False C. Cannot tell Question 2. Ten years ago the level of benefit fraud was higher. A. True B. False C. Cannot tell Question 3. Only the unemployed should legitimately claim these benefits. A. True B. False C. Cannot tell Question 4. The tone of the passage suggests that these reductions in fraud are a good thing. A. True B. False C. Cannot tell Question 5. A year ago the level of benefit fraud totaled £2 billion. A. True B. False C. Cannot tell Answers Question 1. A, Explanation: 80,000 by benefit officers and 44,000 by local authorities; Question 2. B, Explanation: The passage states that the new lower total was the lowest for 10 years so the level must have been lower 10 years ago; Question 3. B, Explanation: Housing benefit is also awarded to the low paid; Question 4. A, Explanation: In the passage the fall in false claims is described as spectacular; Question 5. A, Explanation: The passage states that the £½ billion drop is equivalent to 25%, so the level of fraud 12 months previously would have been £2 billion. 50 Ultimate psychometric tests

FAQ