PEARSON Assessment Practice Test
The PEARSON Assessment Practice Test is a valuable tool that can help you stand out from the crowd and propel your career forward. In this blog post, we will explore what the PEARSON Assessment is, why it matters, and how practicing it can be a game-changer for your professional journey.
The PEARSON Assessment Practice Test is your ticket to career success. It not only assesses your cognitive abilities but also helps you identify your strengths and areas that need development. By preparing diligently and excelling in this test, you can enhance your employability and unlock doors to exciting career opportunities. Embrace the challenge, master the PEARSON test, and embark on a journey toward a brighter and more prosperous future.
What is the PEARSON Assessment Practice Test?
The PEARSON Assessment Practice Test is a comprehensive assessment designed to evaluate a candidate’s cognitive abilities and reasoning skills. It covers various domains, including numerical, verbal, logical, and critical reasoning. Many employers incorporate this test into their hiring processes to identify candidates who possess the aptitude to excel in their respective roles.
Why is it Important?
- Competitive Advantage: In a job market where competition is fierce, performing well in the PEARSON Assessment Practice Test can give you a significant edge. It showcases your capacity to think critically, make sound decisions, and solve complex problems—qualities highly valued by employers.
- Self-Discovery: Taking the PEARSON Assessment Practice Test provides you with valuable insights into your cognitive strengths and areas that may require improvement. This self-awareness can guide your career choices and help you focus on enhancing specific skills.
- Career Alignment: The test results can help you align your career aspirations with your abilities. Whether you’re pursuing a career in technology, finance, healthcare, or any other field, the PEARSON Assessment can assist you in identifying the most suitable opportunities.
- Employer Preference: Many organizations use aptitude tests like PEARSON in their recruitment processes. Excelling in this test can significantly increase your chances of landing your desired job.
How to Excel in the PEARSON Assessment Practice Test
- Understand the Test Format: Familiarize yourself with the structure of the test, including the types of questions and time constraints for each section.
- Practice Regularly: Consistent practice is key to success. Solve sample questions and take mock tests to improve your problem-solving skills and time management.
- Time Management: Efficiently manage your time during the test. Don’t linger too long on a single question; move on and return to it later if needed.
- Seek Guidance: Consider enrolling in a test preparation course or consulting with career advisors who can provide valuable strategies and insights.
- Review and Learn: After each practice test, review the questions you answered incorrectly. Understand where you made mistakes and use those lessons to enhance your performance.
About PEARSON company
Pearson plc is a multinational publishing and education company headquartered in London, England. It was founded as a construction business in the 1840s but switched to publishing in the 1920s. It is the largest education company and was once the largest book publisher in the world. PEARSON mostly uses Watson Glaser-style tests for its candidate selection. The sections on the assessments may include any of the following test sections, depending on the role that you applied to and also the country you are applying from:
- Written Exercise
- Case Study
- Situational Judgement Test
- Proof Reading Test
- Personality Test
Sample PEARSON Assessment Practice Tests and Worked solutions
PEARSON Graduate Practice pack Verbal Reasoning
In the past 12 months, benefit fraud has fallen by £½ billion to its lowest level for over a decade. The fall is equivalent to a 25 percent drop to 1.5 percent of the total £100 billion benefit bill. This spectacular fall follows permission for the benefits office to access Inland Revenue taxation data. Benefit officers can now immediately check to see if a claimant is working and claiming benefits intended only for those out of work. This new measure has led to over 80,000 people being caught making false claims.
A similar initiative has also succeeded in a substantial cut in the level of fraud committed by claimants of housing benefits. Local authorities are responsible for the administration of this allowance which is awarded to the unemployed and low-paid to help with housing costs. Until recently local authority staff had been unable to access central government records to check the information provided by claimants. These checks have so far identified 44,000 claimants who have provided false information in order to make claims for allowances for which they are not eligible.
By making it possible to share information, over 120,000 cases of fraud have been detected.
C. Cannot tell
Ten years ago the level of benefit fraud was higher.
C. Cannot tell
Only the unemployed should legitimately claim these benefits.
C. Cannot tell
The tone of the passage suggests that these reductions in fraud are a good thing.
C. Cannot tell
A year ago the level of benefit fraud totaled £2 billion.
C. Cannot tell
Question 1. An Explanation: 80,000 by benefit officers and 44,000 by local authorities;
Question 2. B, Explanation: The passage states that the new lower total was the lowest for 10 years so the level must have been lower 10 years ago;
Question 3. B, Explanation: Housing benefit is also awarded to the low-paid;
Question 4. An Explanation: In the passage, the fall in false claims is described as spectacular;
Question 5. An Explanation: The passage states that the £½ billion drops is equivalent to 25%, so the level of fraud 12 months previously would have been £2 billion. 50 Ultimate psychometric tests
Question-1 Approximately what percentage of graduates and non-graduates are self-employed?
EXPLANATION Self-employed graduate = 210,000 Self-employed non-graduate = 198,000 and the total = 408,000 Total = 2,100,000 + 900,000 = 3,000,000 Approximate percentage = 408,000/3,000,000 x 100 = 13.6% ≈ 14% Answer: (A)
Question-2 If the number of graduates employed in Health is forecast to decline by 20% year-on-year while the number of non-graduates is forecast to remain the same, how many years will it take for non-graduate employees to outnumber graduate employees in Health?
EXPLANATION 1st year decline by 20% in health for graduates = 20/100 x 315,000 = 63,000, 315,000 – 63,000 = 252, 000
2nd year decline by 20% in health for graduates = 20/100 x 252,000 = 50,400, 252,000– 50,400 = 201,600,
3rd year decline by 20% in health for graduate = 20/100 x 2101,600 = 40,320, 201,600 – 40,320 = 161280, so if required 3 years. Answer: (C)
If the number of graduates employed in Education remains the same while the number of non-graduates increases by 15% per year, how many years will it take for the number of nongraduates to exceed the number of graduates employed in education?
EXPLANATION 1st year 15% increase for non-graduate in education: 0.15 x 117,000 = 17,550, 117,000+17,550 = 134,550
2nd year 15% increase for non-graduate in education: 0.15 x 134,550 = 20,182.5, 134,550+20,182.5 = 154,732.5
3rd year 15% increase for non-graduate in education: 0.15 x 154,732.5 = 23, 209.875, 23,209.875+154,732.5 = 177,942.375
4th year 15% increase for non-graduate in education: 0.15 x 177,942.375 = 26,691.35 26,691.35+177,942.375 = 204,633.73
5th year 15% increase for non-graduate in education: 0.15 x 204,633.73 = 30,695.06, 30,695.06+204,633.73 = 235,328.79
6th year 15% increase for non-graduate in education: 0.15 x 235,328.79 = 35299.32 35299.32+235,328.79 = 280,628.11
7th year 15% increase for non-graduate in education: 0.15 x 270,628.11 = 40,594.22 40,594.22 270,628.11 = 311,222.33 is the year 7th Answer: (E)
What is the number of self-employed graduates as a proportion of the total number of individuals in Tarleton district?
EXPLANATION Self-employed graduate = 2,100,000 Total individual = 2,100,000+900,000 = 3,000,000 Proportion = 210,000/3,000,000 x 100 = 0.07 x 100 = 7% Answer: (E)