Allen & Overy Practice Aptitude Test Pack 2023

Allen & Overy Practice Aptitude Test Pack For 2023

Allen &OVERY is committed to being the world’s most advanced law firm. Equipping clients to meet the demands of today’s changing and challenging environment has prompted our growth into new complementary services. Allen & Overy Graduate Practice pack is designed to help Kick off your preparation with our Allen & Overy Practice Aptitude Test Pack For 2023 (all-in-one pack): Allen & Overy Numerical reasoning test / Allen & Overy Assessment Allen & Overy Verbal reasoning test / Allen & Overy Assessment Allen & Overy Logical Reasoning Tests / Allen & Overy Assessment With step-by-step explanations on every question, and hints on how to solve them faster.

About Allen & Overy company

Allen & Overy LLP (informally A&O) is an international law firm. It is a member of the UK’s Magic Circle of leading law firms. In 2019, Allen & Overy advised on more transactional deals than any other law firm in the world and was one of two firms to have surpassed the US$1 trillion mark in terms of deal value, totaling US$1.16 trillion. As of 2019, Allen & Overy is the world’s 10th largest law firm by revenue Allen & Overy Aptitude tests formats; What to expect: Allen & Overy mostly uses  CEB/Gartner (SHL) style tests for its candidate selection. The sections on the assessments may include any of the following test sections, depending on the role that you applied to and also the country you are applying from:

1. Numerical Reasoning
2. Verbal Reasoning
3. Number Sequences
4. Group Exercise
5. Case Study
6. Interview
7. Personality Test

Sample Allen & Overy Graduate Practice Aptitude Test Questions and answers

Allen & Overy Graduate Practice pack Numerical Reasoning

Question 1 

If the revenue for Car Rental in 2004 was half that for Hotels in 2005 when Holiday Lettings accounted for 5.04m Euros, what was the revenue from Hotels in 2004?

A. 0.84m

B. 1.05m

C. 1.26m

D. 2.10m

E. 2.52m

EXPLANATION Let the revenue for car rental in 2004 be x Let the hotel in 2005 be y Holidays lettings = 5.04m Therefore in 2015 = 40/100 x y = 5.04m Y = 5.04/ 0.4 = 12.6m, where y in the total revenue in 2005 Therefore, the revenue for hotel y in 2005is given by 20/100 x 12.6 = 2.52m Euros Since x for car rental in 2004 equal half hotels that is x = ½ x 2.52 = 1.26m Euros The revenue of car rental in 2004 is 1.26m Euros.

Answer: (C)

Question 2

If Other Revenue grew by 50% to 1.26m in 2005, approximately how much revenue did Holiday Lettings generate in 2004?

A. 1.05m

B. 1.26m

C. 2.52m

D. 2.63m

E. 3.68m

EXPLANATION Other revenue increased by 50% to 1.26m in 2005 The initial amount for other revenue is 10% For 50% increase = 0.5 x 0.1 x x 0.1 x x = 1.26, where x is the total revenue in 2005 0.15x = 1.26, x = 8.4m Euros Therefore 0.1 x 8.4 = 0.08 x y, where y is the total revenue in 2004 0.84 = 0.08y, y = 10.5m Euros Since holiday and lettings in 2004 = 0.35 x 10.5 = 3.675 ~ 3.68m.

Answer: (E)

Question 3

If starting from 2004, Hotel revenue grew by 20% year on year to 2.26m in at2007, approximately how much revenue did hotel revenue account for as of 2004? A. 1.16m B. 1.26m C. 1.52m D. 1.63m E. 1.68m EXPLANATION 16 Seconds year 2004 and hotel revenue = 20% of x, where x is the revenue at 2004: 0.2 x x = 0.2x Year 5 is 20% increase = 20% of 0.2x 0.2x 0.2 x 0.2x 0.2x = 0.24x Year 2006 = 0.2 x 0.24x 0.24x = 0.288x Year 2007 = 0.2 x 0.288x 0.288x = 2.26m 30.3456x = 2.26m,, x = 6.539m Therefore the revenue for 2004 = 0.2 x 6.53m =1. 31m (1.26 is safe) Answer: (C)

Question 4 If Travel Revenue grew by 30% to 1m in 2005, approximately how much revenue did Holiday Lettings generate in 2004?

A. 1.05m

B. 1.26m

C. 1.54m

D. 2.63m

E. 3.68m

EXPLANATION 3rd in 2004, travel revenue = 0.35x, where x is the total revenue In 2005 is 30% increase = 0.30 x 0.25x 0.25x = 1m, 0.325x = 1 Total revenue for x = 3.077m in 2004 Therefore holiday lettings revenue = 0.35 x 3.077 = 1.05. Answer: (A)

Allen & Overy Graduate Practice pack Verbal Reasoning

In the past 12 months, benefit fraud has fallen by £½ billion to its lowest level for over a decade. The fall is equivalent to a 25 percent drop to 1.5 percent of the total £100 billion benefit bill. This spectacular fall follows permission for the benefits office to access Inland Revenue taxation data. Benefit officers can now immediately check to see if a claimant is working and claiming benefits intended only for those out of work. This new measure has led to over 80,000 people being caught making false claims. A similar initiative has also succeeded in a substantial cut in the level of fraud committed by claimants of housing benefits. Local authorities are responsible for the administration of this allowance which is awarded to the unemployed and low-paid to help with housing costs. Until recently local authority staff had been unable to access central government records to check the information provided by claimants. These checks have so far identified 44,000 claimants who have provided false information in order to make claims for allowances for which they are not eligible.

Question 1. By making it possible to share information, over 120,000 cases of fraud have been detected.

A. True

B. False

C. Cannot tell

Question 2.

Ten years ago the level of benefit fraud was higher.

A. True

B. False

C. Cannot tell

Question 3. Only the unemployed should legitimately claim these benefits.

A. True

B. False

C. Cannot tell

Question 4.

The tone of the passage suggests that these reductions in fraud are a good thing.

A. True

B. False

C. Cannot tell

Question 5.

A year ago the level of benefit fraud totaled £2 billion.

A. True

B. False

C. Cannot tell

Answers

Question 1. An Explanation: 80,000 by benefit officers and 44,000 by local authorities;

Question 2. B, Explanation: The passage states that the new lower total was the lowest for 10 years so the level must have been lower 10 years ago;

Question 3. B, Explanation: Housing benefit is also awarded to the low-paid;

Question 4. An Explanation: In the passage, the fall in false claims is described as spectacular;

Question 5. An Explanation: The passage states that the £½ billion drop is equivalent to 25%, so the level of fraud 12 months previously would have been £2 billion. 50 Ultimate psychometric tests

Handpicked Related Practice Packs

• AMERICAN EXPRESS Graduate Assessment Practice Questions pack
• AstraZeneca Graduate Assessment Practice Questions pack
• Atos Graduate Assessment Practice Questions pack
• BAE systems Graduate Assessment Practice Questions pack
• AXA Graduate Assessment Practice Questions pack

FAQ