Allen & Overy Online Practice Test
For aspiring legal professionals, securing a position at a prestigious law firm like Allen & Overy is a significant achievement. As part of the recruitment process, candidates often encounter the Allen & Overy Practice Aptitude Test. In this blog post, we’ll delve into what the Allen & Overy Practice Aptitude Test entails, why it’s vital, and how you can prepare effectively to stand out in the competitive world of legal careers.
Understanding the Allen & Overy Practice Aptitude Test
The Allen & Overy Practice Aptitude Test is a comprehensive assessment designed to evaluate a candidate’s cognitive abilities and problem-solving skills, especially in the context of legal scenarios. It covers various domains, including numerical reasoning, verbal reasoning, logical reasoning, and critical thinking. Allen & Overy uses this test to identify individuals who not only meet the qualifications but also possess the aptitude to excel in legal roles.
Why is it Important?
- Competitive Edge: In a highly competitive legal job market, excelling in the Allen & Overy Practice Aptitude Test can give you a significant edge. It showcases your ability to think critically, analyze legal information, and make informed decisions—qualities highly valued by top law firms.
- Skills Validation: Taking the Allen & Overy Practice Aptitude Test provides valuable insights into your cognitive strengths and areas that may need improvement. This self-awareness can guide your career choices and help you focus on honing specific skills.
- Career Alignment: The test results can help you align your legal career aspirations with your abilities. Whether you’re interested in corporate law, litigation, or any other legal field, the Allen & Overy test can assist you in identifying the most suitable opportunities.
- Employer Preference: Prestigious law firms like Allen & Overy use aptitude tests to select candidates who possess the right blend of qualifications and cognitive skills. Excelling in this test can significantly enhance your chances of securing a position at top legal firms.
Preparing for Success
- Understanding the Test Format: Start by familiarizing yourself with the structure of the Allen & Overy Practice Aptitude Test, including the types of legal questions and time limits for each section.
- Regular Practice: Consistent practice is crucial. Solve sample legal questions, take mock tests, and use practice resources provided by Allen & Overy to improve your problem-solving skills and time management.
- Time Management: During the actual test, efficiently manage your time. Don’t get bogged down by a single question or section; move forward and return to it later if necessary.
- Seek Guidance: Consider enrolling in a test preparation course or consulting with career advisors who can provide valuable strategies and insights tailored to legal aptitude tests.
- Review and Learn: After each practice test, review the legal questions you answered incorrectly. Understand where you made mistakes and use those lessons to enhance your performance.
About Allen & Overy company
Allen & Overy LLP (informally A&O) is an international law firm. It is a member of the UK’s Magic Circle of leading law firms. In 2019, Allen & Overy advised on more transactional deals than any other law firm in the world and was one of two firms to have surpassed the US$1 trillion mark in terms of deal value, totaling US$1.16 trillion. As of 2019, Allen & Overy is the world’s 10th largest law firm by revenue Allen & Overy Aptitude tests formats; What to expect: Allen & Overy mostly uses CEB/Gartner (SHL) style tests for its candidate selection. The sections on the assessments may include any of the following test sections, depending on the role that you applied to and also the country you are applying from:
- Numerical Reasoning
- Verbal Reasoning
- Number Sequences
- Group Exercise
- Case Study
- Interview
- Personality Test
Sample Allen & Overy Assessment Practice Tests and Worked solutions
Allen & Overy Graduate Practice pack Numerical Reasoning
Question 1
If the revenue for Car Rental in 2004 was half that for Hotels in 2005 when Holiday Lettings accounted for 5.04m Euros, what was the revenue from Hotels in 2004?
A. 0.84m
B. 1.05m
C. 1.26m
D. 2.10m
E. 2.52m
EXPLANATION Let the revenue for car rental in 2004 be x Let the hotel in 2005 be y Holidays lettings = 5.04m Therefore in 2015 = 40/100 x y = 5.04m Y = 5.04/ 0.4 = 12.6m, where y in the total revenue in 2005 Therefore, the revenue for hotel y in 2005is given by 20/100 x 12.6 = 2.52m Euros Since x for car rental in 2004 equal half hotels that is x = ½ x 2.52 = 1.26m Euros The revenue of car rental in 2004 is 1.26m Euros.
Answer: (C)
Question 2
If Other Revenue grew by 50% to 1.26m in 2005, approximately how much revenue did Holiday Lettings generate in 2004?
A. 1.05m
B. 1.26m
C. 2.52m
D. 2.63m
E. 3.68m
EXPLANATION Other revenue increased by 50% to 1.26m in 2005 The initial amount for other revenue is 10% For 50% increase = 0.5 x 0.1 x x 0.1 x x = 1.26, where x is the total revenue in 2005 0.15x = 1.26, x = 8.4m Euros Therefore 0.1 x 8.4 = 0.08 x y, where y is the total revenue in 2004 0.84 = 0.08y, y = 10.5m Euros Since holiday and lettings in 2004 = 0.35 x 10.5 = 3.675 ~ 3.68m.
Answer: (E)
Question 3
If starting from 2004, Hotel revenue grew by 20% year on year to 2.26m in at2007, approximately how much revenue did hotel revenue account for as of 2004? A. 1.16m B. 1.26m C. 1.52m D. 1.63m E. 1.68m EXPLANATION 16 Seconds year 2004 and hotel revenue = 20% of x, where x is the revenue at 2004: 0.2 x x = 0.2x Year 5 is 20% increase = 20% of 0.2x 0.2x 0.2 x 0.2x 0.2x = 0.24x Year 2006 = 0.2 x 0.24x 0.24x = 0.288x Year 2007 = 0.2 x 0.288x 0.288x = 2.26m 30.3456x = 2.26m,, x = 6.539m Therefore the revenue for 2004 = 0.2 x 6.53m =1. 31m (1.26 is safe) Answer: (C)
Question 4 If Travel Revenue grew by 30% to 1m in 2005, approximately how much revenue did Holiday Lettings generate in 2004?
A. 1.05m
B. 1.26m
C. 1.54m
D. 2.63m
E. 3.68m
EXPLANATION 3rd in 2004, travel revenue = 0.35x, where x is the total revenue In 2005 is 30% increase = 0.30 x 0.25x 0.25x = 1m, 0.325x = 1 Total revenue for x = 3.077m in 2004 Therefore holiday lettings revenue = 0.35 x 3.077 = 1.05. Answer: (A)
Allen & Overy Graduate Practice pack Verbal Reasoning
In the past 12 months, benefit fraud has fallen by £½ billion to its lowest level for over a decade. The fall is equivalent to a 25 percent drop to 1.5 percent of the total £100 billion benefit bill. This spectacular fall follows permission for the benefits office to access Inland Revenue taxation data. Benefit officers can now immediately check to see if a claimant is working and claiming benefits intended only for those out of work. This new measure has led to over 80,000 people being caught making false claims. A similar initiative has also succeeded in a substantial cut in the level of fraud committed by claimants of housing benefits. Local authorities are responsible for the administration of this allowance which is awarded to the unemployed and low-paid to help with housing costs. Until recently local authority staff had been unable to access central government records to check the information provided by claimants. These checks have so far identified 44,000 claimants who have provided false information in order to make claims for allowances for which they are not eligible.
Question 1. By making it possible to share information, over 120,000 cases of fraud have been detected.
A. True
B. False
C. Cannot tell
Question 2.
Ten years ago the level of benefit fraud was higher.
A. True
B. False
C. Cannot tell
Question 3. Only the unemployed should legitimately claim these benefits.
A. True
B. False
C. Cannot tell
Question 4.
The tone of the passage suggests that these reductions in fraud are a good thing.
A. True
B. False
C. Cannot tell
Question 5.
A year ago the level of benefit fraud totaled £2 billion.
A. True
B. False
C. Cannot tell
Answers
Question 1. An Explanation: 80,000 by benefit officers and 44,000 by local authorities;
Question 2. B, Explanation: The passage states that the new lower total was the lowest for 10 years so the level must have been lower 10 years ago;
Question 3. B, Explanation: Housing benefit is also awarded to the low-paid;
Question 4. An Explanation: In the passage, the fall in false claims is described as spectacular;
Question 5. An Explanation: The passage states that the £½ billion drop is equivalent to 25%, so the level of fraud 12 months previously would have been £2 billion. 50 Ultimate psychometric tests